Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
85
Score
Governance
85
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 31.3% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 43.7% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 33.6% 36 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 20.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 39 Fragile Recovery
2017 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 6.1% 40 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 7.1% 40 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DONNA BLANCHARD Executive Director 20.4% of Rev
HARRY WONG Artistic Director 10.8% of Rev
MARCUS OSHIRO Board President
DENNIS SEKINE VICE-PRESIDE
DENISE AIKO CHINEN Secretary
JASON KANDA Secretary
ADAM HUTTLER Treasurer
ELIZABETH ERRICO Board Member
MARK KALAHELE Board Member
KAREN LOEBL KAULANA Board Member
BROOKE LEE Board Member
ANNIE MACAPAGAL Board Member
TERI SKILLMAN Board Member
TONY PISCULLI Board Member
VICTORIA WEI Board Member
JOHN WAT Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DONNA BLANCHARD Board Member 18.6% of Rev
HARRY WONG Artistic Director 10.2% of Rev
DENNIS CARROLL Board Member
DENISE AIKO CHINEN Board Member
JASON KANDA Board Member
ANNIE MACAPAGAL Board President
KAREN LOEBL KAULANA Board Member
JIM MURPHY Board Member
JOHN WAT Board Member
DANN SEKI Board Member
BLANE ASAO Treasurer
MICHELLE KIM-STONE Secretary
LEILANI KAHOANO Board Member
MARCUS OSHIRO Board Member
TONY PISCULLI Board President
ADAM HUTTLER Board Member
VICTORIA WEI Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DONNA BLANCHARD Board Member 18.3% of Rev
HARRY WONG Artistic Director 9.9% of Rev
DENNIS CARROLL Board Member
DENISE AIKO CHINEN Board Member
JASON KANDA Board Member
ANNIE MACAPAGAL Board President
KAREN LOEBL KAULANA Board Member
JIM MURPHY Board Member
JOHN WAT Board Member
DANN SEKI Board Member
BLANE ASAO Treasurer
MICHELLE KIM-STONE Secretary
LEILANI KAHOANO Board Member
MARCUS OSHIRO Board Member
TONY PISCULLI Board President
ADAM HUTTLER Board Member
VICTORIA WEI Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DONNA BLANCHARD Board Member 11.1% of Rev
HARRY WONG Artistic Director 8.0% of Rev
DENNIS CARROLL Board Member
DENISE AIKO CHINEN Board Member
JASON KANDA Board Member
ANNIE MACAPAGAL Board President
KAREN LOEBL KAULANA Board Member
JIM MURPHY Board Member
JOHN WAT Board Member
DANN SEKI Board Member
BLANE ASAO Treasurer
MICHELLE KIM-STONE Secretary
LEILANI KAHOANO Board Member
MARCUS OSHIRO Board Member
TONY PISCULLI Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
85 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
85 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,506 other orgs in US with NTEE prefix S8.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 0 points above the peer median (85 vs. 85).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.