Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
46
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 21.1% 46 Fragile Gov Risk
2023 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 29.9% 40 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2015 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 45 Fragile Recovery
2012 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Gabriel Reoyo-Pazos Artistic Director 9.0% of Rev
Kimberly Poli Artistic Director 9.0% of Rev
Eloise Porter Marketing And Promotion 2.7% of Rev
Jeanne Mitchell Board Member 0.3% of Rev
Fran Benedict Board President
Kathleen Belwish Board President
Robert Chauls Board President
Claudia Sobol Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Gabriel Reoyo-Pazos Artistic Director 21.1% of Rev
Gabriel Reoyo-Pazos Artistic Director 13.6% of Rev
Kimberly Poli Artistic Director 10.6% of Rev
Eloise Porter Marketing And Promotion 4.0% of Rev
Jeanne Mitchell Board Member 0.7% of Rev
Fran Benedict Board President
Kathleen Belwish Board President
Robert Chauls Board President
Claudia Sobol Treasurer
Fran Benedict Board President
Kathleen Belwish Board President
Robert Chauls Board President
Claudia Sobol Treasurer
Jeanne Mitchell Board Member
Kimberly Poli Board Member
Carol Tavis Board Member
Erick Block Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 32 points above the peer median (65 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.