Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
37
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 44.9% 37 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2022 — — 11.8% 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 14.3% 39 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 19.4% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 13.7% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — — 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — — 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 43 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — — 47 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
REGINA KLENJOSKI Artistic Director 26.3% of Rev
ANNA JANS Executive Dir. 18.6% of Rev
SEAN KOTZIN Board Member —
ANGELA JOHNSON PETERS Board President —
LINDA ROSENBLOOM Secretary —
JAN SWARTZENDRUBER Board Member —
SAM SMITH Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
REGINA KLENJOSKI Artistic Director 20.3% of Rev
STEPHEN SCHMIDT ADVISORY BOARD —
ANGELA JOHNSON PETERS Board President —
LINDA CHIAVAROLI Secretary —
JAN SWARTZENDRUBER Board Member —
JENNIE LINTHORST ADVISORY BOARD —
NICK JOHNSON ADVISORY BOARD —
FIONA SANADA Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
REGINA KLENJOSKI Artistic Director 16.8% of Rev
STEPHEN SCHMIDT ADVISORY BOARD —
ANGELA JOHNSON PETERS Board President —
LINDA CHIAVAROLI Secretary —
JAN SWARTZENDRUBER Board Member —
JENNIE LINTHORST ADVISORY BOARD —
NICK JOHNSON ADVISORY BOARD —
FIONA SANADA Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
REGINA KLENJOSKI Artistic Director 14.4% of Rev
GENEVA MARTIN Board Member —
STEPHEN SCHMIDT ADVISORY BOARD —
ANGELEA JOHNSON PETERS Board President —
LINDA CHIAVAROLI Secretary —
AMY SCHELTON Board Member —
JENNIE LINTHORST ADVISORY BOARD —
NICK JOHNSON ADVISORY BOARD —
FIONA SANADA Board Member —
SABRINA KERCH Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 74 other orgs in KS with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 15 points below the peer median (42 vs. 57).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 44.9% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.