Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation ↑
Overall
46
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 7.9% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — 8.6% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 5.5% 54 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 5.1% 50 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 6.4% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 8.1% 42 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 8.8% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 — — 9.6% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 — — 10.9% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 — — 11.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 8.9% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 — — 10.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — 11.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2010 — — 13.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOEL ARQUILLOS Executive Director 7.6% of Rev
MELISSA DENTON Executive Director 1.5% of Rev
ABIRAM BRIZUELA Executive Director 1.2% of Rev
JOHN FREELAND Board Member —
RYAN KING Board Member —
KARINE ROSENTHAL Board Member —
JULISA ARCE Board Member —
ALBERT CHOU Board Member —
JULIO QUIJADA Board Member —
RYAN JONES Treasurer —
DECKER SADOWSKI Board President —
SARA SCOTT Board President —
JOE WEIL Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MELISSA DENTON Executive Director 6.3% of Rev
KARINE ROSENTHAL Board Member —
MELISSA PETERMAN Board Member —
JOE WEIL Board Member —
ALISON STERNBERG Board Member —
KRISTINA SEGESVARY Board Member —
DECKER SADOWSKI Board Member —
JULIO QUIJADA Board Member —
DAVID BORSARI Board Member —
ANNIE DENG Board Member —
ALBERT CHOU Board Member —
CHARLOTTE WHITE Board President —
SARA SCOTT Board President —
RYAN JONES Secretary —
RUSS CASHDAN Treasurer —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

Overall score has gone from 42 → 46 over 5 years (improving by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.