Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation
Overall
44
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 7.2% 44 Fragile Recovery
2023 18.1% 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 20.3% 41 Fragile Recovery
2021 8.9% 40 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 0.8% 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 45.9% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 39.9% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2016 50.0% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2015 96.0% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 53.7% 40 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2013 40.0% 40 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2012 58.7% 40 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Board Member 7.2% of Rev

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Board Member 8.2% of Rev

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Board Member 6.6% of Rev

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Board Member 18.7% of Rev
Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 24 other orgs in DE with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points below the peer median (5 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.