Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
85
Score
Governance
85
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 14.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 24.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 26.1% 44 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 12.9% 40 Fragile Recovery
2019 14.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 13.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 18.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 11.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 27.4% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 26.9% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 29.8% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 32.6% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 32.9% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LUKE MCENDARFER Artistic Director 5.1% of Rev
ROSE CHOLAKIAN CF GROUP Treasurer 3.2% of Rev
CHELSEA MOREL SVP & COO 2.3% of Rev
JAMES T WHEATLEY Vice President 2.0% of Rev
PAMELA BLACKSTONE CPO 2.0% of Rev
KAREN MURPHY O'BRIEN Board President
DAVID MUMFORD Board Member
MELISSA TWOMEY Board Member
BESSIE CHIANG Board Member
RONALD HOHAUSER Board Member
JESSICA KOSMOWSKI Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LUKE MCENDARFER Artistic Director 4.3% of Rev
CHELSEA MOREL COO 2.0% of Rev
PAMELA E BLACKSTONE CPO 1.8% of Rev
ROSE CHOLAKIAN CONTROLLER & 1.8% of Rev
JAMES T WHEATLEY CCO 1.6% of Rev
KAREN MURPHY O'BRIEN Board President
LISA GRODE Secretary
RONALD HOHAUSER Treasurer
DAVID MUMFORD Board Member
MELISSA TWOMEY Board Member
BESSIE CHIANG Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LUKE MCENDARFER Executive Director 4.7% of Rev
CHELSEA MOREL Board Member 1.8% of Rev
PAMELA BLACKSTONE Artistic Director 1.8% of Rev
JAMES T WHEATLEY Board Member 1.5% of Rev
ROSE CHOLAKIAN Treasurer 1.1% of Rev
KAREN MURPHY O'BRIEN Board President
LISA GRODE Secretary
RONALD HOHAUSER Treasurer
DAVID MUMFORD Board Member
MELISSA TWOMEY Board Member
BESSIE CHIANG Board Member
BARBERA THORNHILL Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LUKE MCENDARFER Executive Director 3.9% of Rev
CHELSEA MOREL Board Member 1.8% of Rev
PAMELA BLACKSTONE Artistic Director 1.6% of Rev
KAREN MURPHY O'BRIEN Board President
LISA GRODE Secretary
RONALD HOHAUSER Treasurer
DEBORAH BIRNDORF Board Member
DAVID MUMFORD Board Member
MELISSA TWOMEY Board Member
BESSIE CHIANG Board Member
BARBERA THORNHILL Board Member
ROSE CHOLAKIAN Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
85 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
85 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 2,343 other orgs in US with NTEE prefix Z9.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 0 points above the peer median (85 vs. 85).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.