Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

"Fosters artistic and personal excellence in young musicians and preserves symphonic music for future generations, offering free classical music concerts to the community."

— Statement of Program Service Accomplishments

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↑
Overall
40
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 8.9% 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2023 Hidden Hidden — 40 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — — 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 — — 31.2% 13 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 — — 17.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 — — 12.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBERT OZAKI Board Member —
DAVID NORTHHART Board President —
AUDREY LAMPREY Secretary —
ROBERT OZAKI Treasurer —
JANET SAMUEL Executive Dir. —
JANE CHEN Board Member —
HOLLIE LOHFF Board Member —
NANCY LIN Board Member —
LOU AND ERICA PAIK Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JANET SAMUEL Executive Dir. 8.9% of Rev
BIPASA NADON Board President —
DAVID NORTHHART Board President —
AUDREY LAMPREY Secretary —
ROBERT OZAKI Treasurer —
JANE CHEN Board Member —
HOLLIE LOHFF Board Member —
NANCY LIN Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JANET SAMUEL Executive Director 8.9% of Rev
JANE CHEN Board President —
DAVID NORTHHART Board President —
AUDREY LAMPREY Secretary —
ROBERT OZAKI Treasurer —
HOLLIE LOHFF Board Member —
NANCY LIN Board Member —
BIPASA NADON Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
40 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 28 points below the peer median (25 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.