Structural Deficit
What does this mean?
Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.
The Path Forward
The Truth-Teller
Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | — | — | 34.2% | 26 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2022 | — | — | 27.2% | 34 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2021 | — | — | 14.2% | 35 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | 11.3% | 35 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2019 | — | — | 4.7% | 41 | Financially Distressed | Stable Watch | |
| 2018 | — | — | 2.1% | 38 | Financially Distressed | Recovery | |
| 2017 | — | — | 3.0% | 36 | Financially Distressed | Stable Watch | |
| 2016 | — | — | 3.0% | 36 | Financially Distressed | Stable Watch | |
| 2015 | — | — | 5.2% | 34 | Critical Intervention Needed | Recovery | |
| 2014 | — | — | 3.2% | 32 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch | |
| 2013 | — | — | 2.5% | 32 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2012 | — | — | 4.7% | 38 | Financially Distressed | Recovery | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 45 | Financially Distressed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARMANDO HUIPE | Executive Director | 15.6% of Rev | ||
| GARY GROSSMAN | Artistic Director | 3.9% of Rev | ||
| SANDRA GROSSMAN | Board Member | 1.8% of Rev | ||
| GREG GOETHALS SJ | Board President | — | ||
| DALE RAOUL | Secretary | — | ||
| WILLIAM SLOCUM | Treasurer | — | ||
| TONY ABATEMARCO | Board Member | — | ||
| BRADFORD BANCROFT | Board Member | — | ||
| WENDY KOUT | Board Member | — | ||
| JEFF RENO | Board Member | — | ||
| LEE SHERMAN | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GARY GROSSMAN | Board President | 12.6% of Rev | ||
| ARMANDO HUIPE | Executive Director | 12.6% of Rev | ||
| SANDRA GROSSMAN | Secretary | 5.4% of Rev | ||
| FR GREGORY GOETHALS SJ | Board President | — | ||
| WILLIAM SLOCUM | Treasurer | — | ||
| KAREN DALE RAOUL | Secretary | — | ||
| BRADFORD BANCROFT | Board Member | — | ||
| WENDY KOUT | Board Member | — | ||
| JEFF RENO | Board Member | — | ||
| LEE SHERMAN | Board Member | — | ||
| TONY ABATEMARCO | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GARY GROSSMAN | Board Member | 4.6% of Rev | ||
| SANDRA GROSSMAN | Executive Director | 4.6% of Rev | ||
| MICHAEL KEARNS | Board Member | 1.0% of Rev | ||
| FR GREGORY GOETHALS SJ | Board President | — | ||
| WILLIAM SLOCUM | Treasurer | — | ||
| KAREN DALE RAOUL | Secretary | — | ||
| BRADFORD BANCROFT | Board Member | — | ||
| WENDY KOUT | Board Member | — | ||
| JEFF RENO | Board Member | — | ||
| LEE SHERMAN | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points below the peer median (0 vs. 33).
5-year trend: Structural Deficit
Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 34.2% is above the 90th percentile for orgs of this size (healthy band: 18–22%).
- Financial resilience score in the bottom quartile — reserves and liabilities ratios warrant review.
- Sustained governance decline: score fell from 58 to 42 across 4 years — a multi-year pattern, not a single bad filing.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Reduce top-officer compensation from 34.2% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~24 points.
- Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.