Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 48 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 55 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 46 | Financially Distressed | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 43 | Financially Distressed | Stable Watch | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 41 | Financially Distressed | Stable Watch | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 49 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 41 | Financially Distressed | Decline Risk | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GREGORY BERARDO | Treasurer | — | ||
| RICK VASQUEZ | Board President | — | ||
| MONICA VAZQUEZ | Board President | — | ||
| CHRISTINE BERARDO | Secretary | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHEILA DELA VEGA REESE | Board President | — | ||
| RICK VASQUEZ | Board President | — | ||
| MONICA VAZQUEZ | Board President | — | ||
| GREG BERARDO | Treasurer | — | ||
| BRANDY MASON | Board President | — | ||
| BRANDY MASON | FUNDRAISING CHA | — | ||
| MIREYA SANCHEZ | Board President | — | ||
| ALFONSO SANCHEZ | FOOTBALL/COM CH | — | ||
| CHRISTINE BERARDO | MERCHANDISE CHA | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 46 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A1.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 26 points below the peer median (5 vs. 31).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 47 → 41 over 5 years (declining by 6 points).
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.