Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 39 Fragile Recovery
2020 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2011 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ed Smart Board President
Susan Caklins Board President
Tony Gitt Treasurer
Laurie Hanig Board Member
Patricia Smart Board Member
Cristina Barrett Board Member
Brian Gaffney Board Member
John Pillsbury Board Member
Debra Sokolow Board Member
Pat Johnson Board Member
Connie Tunick Board Member
Geri Schonberg Board Member
Kristine Clark Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GERI SCHONBERG Secretary
ED SMART Board President
TONY GITT Treasurer
LAURIE HANIG MEMBERSHI
PAT JOHNSON Board Member
BILLY PARISH Board President
CONNIE TUNICK EXHIBITIONS
PATRICIA SMART Treasurer
JEAN SAUNDERS PUBLIC REL/MKTG
BRIAN GAFFNEY ELECTRONIC MED
ANTHONY ANGELINI HOSPITALITY
JOHN JOHNSON Board Member
STEPHANIE WILSON Board Member
JOHN PILLSBURY INFORMATION SVS
KRISTINE CLARK MEMBERSHIP
GERI SCHONBERG Secretary
ED SMART Board President
RICHARD WILLIAMS Treasurer
KIMBERLY WRIGHT Board Member
PAT JOHNSON Board Member
BILLY PARISH Board President
CONNIE TUNICK EXHIBITIONS
PATRICIA SMART Treasurer
JEAN SAUNDERS PUBLIC REL/MKTG
MATT NORDQUIST ELECTRONIC MED
ANTHONY ANGELINI HOSPITALITY
JOHN JOHNSON Board Member
STEPHANIE WILSON Board Member
JOHN PILLSBURY INFORMATION SVS
JANNY FRANKEN MEMBERSHIP
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 171 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 25 points below the peer median (5 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

Overall score has gone from 39 → 41 over 5 years (improving by 2 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.