Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 10.3% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 5.9% 52 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 19.5% 49 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 — — 12.4% 51 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 12.1% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — 4.7% 55 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 16.6% 45 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 7.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 7.5% 42 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — 8.8% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — 5.9% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 — — 10.2% 42 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 — — 5.8% 54 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Christopher A Brown Executive Director 5.6% of Rev
Robert Istad Artistic Director 4.7% of Rev
Abby Manaye Controller 4.4% of Rev
Thomas A Pridonoff Board President —
Marcia O'Hern Secretary —
Michael Vantrease Treasurer —
David Bunker Board President —
Chris Lindley Board President —
Susan Lindley Board President —
Mary A Lyons Board President —
Charles Zhang Board President —
Stephane Quinn Board Member —
Craig Springer Board President —
Amanda Whiting Board Member —
Richard J McNeil Board Member —
Ryan Ratcliff Board President —
CHRISTOPHER ZHAO Board Member —
LI HONG WANG Board Member —
BRIAN BATES Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Christopher A Brown Executive Director 5.4% of Rev
Robert Istad Artistic Director 3.4% of Rev
Thomas A Pridonoff Board President —
Marcia O'Hern Secretary —
David Bunker Board President —
Chris Lindley Board President —
Susan Lindley Board President —
Mary A Lyons Board President —
Charles Zhang Board President —
Michael Vantrease Treasurer —
Mark Hoover Board Member —
Craig Springer Board Member —
Amanda Whiting Board Member —
Richard J McNeil Board Member —
Ryan Ratcliff Board Member —
David Yellin Board Member —
Stephane Quinn Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Christopher A Brown Executive Director 5.3% of Rev
Robert Istad Artistic Director 3.4% of Rev
Thomas A Pridonoff Board President —
Marcia O'Hern Secretary —
Michael Vantrease Treasurer —
David Bunker Board President —
Chris Lindley Board President —
Susan Lindley Board President —
Mary A Lyons Board President —
Charles Zhang Board President —
Stephane Quinn Board Member —
Mark Hoover Board Member —
Jan Landstrom Board Member —
Craig Springer Board Member —
Amanda Whiting Board Member —
Richard J McNeil Board Member —
Ryan Ratcliff Board Member —
David Yellin Board Member —
Kurt Mayo Board Member —
Sara McFerrin Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 48 → 48 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.