Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2023 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 54 Fragile Recovery
2020 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 3.6% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 3.8% 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TOM PLUNKETT Vice President
AMI GARVIN Vice President
ZACHARY CHRISTY Board President
RAUL GUERRERO Vice President
DUANE OTANI Treasurer
SCOTT DOMINGUES Secretary
ERIC SAMSON Vice President
NEIL ANDERSON Vice President
JANET SMITH Vice President
BRAD HARRIS Vice President
DARNELLA DAVIDSON Vice President
SUSAN WILLMERING Vice President
AMY VILLANOVA Vice President
BRITTANY MARTINEZ Vice President
CATHY OLINGER Board President
BINCINS GARCIA Vice President
JONATHAN PESKE Vice President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DENNIS CRYSTAL Vice President
BRIAN HAMILTON Vice President
CATHY OLINGER Board President
BINCIAS GARCIA Vice President
JEANNE CHRISTENSEN Board President
TOM PHLLIPS Vice President
ZACHARY CHRISTY Treasurer
ANTHONY ALLMOND Vice President
DUANE OTANI Board President
NANCY ROBINSON Vice President
SCOTT DOMINGUES Secretary
STEVE GRAVES Vice President
BRIAN BELSKI Vice President
JANET SMITH Vice President
BRAD HARRIS Vice President
DARNELLA DAVIDSON Vice President
SUSAN WILLMERING Vice President
AMY VILLANOVA Vice President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEANNE CHRISTENSEN Board President
TOM PHLLIPS Vice President
ZACHARY CHRISTY Treasurer
JOE DUDEK Vice President
DUANE OTANI Board President
PAUL BLUTO Vice President
SCOTT DOMINGUES Secretary
STEVE GRAVES Vice President
BRIAN BELSKI Vice President
RAY LLEWELLYN Vice President
JIM WANG Vice President
DARNELLA DAVIDSON Vice President
SUSAN WILLMERING Vice President
AMY VILLANOVA Vice President
DENNIS CRYSTAL Vice President
BRIAN HAMILTON Vice President
CATHY OLINGER Board President
BINCIAS GARCIA Vice President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEANNE CHRISTENSEN Board President
ANDY MAGANA Vice President
ZACHARY CHRISTY Treasurer
JOE DUDEK Vice President
DUANE OTANI Board President
PAUL BLUTO Vice President
SCOTT DOMINGUES Vice President
STEVE GRAVES Vice President
SUSIE MARIN Vice President
RAY LLEWELLYA Vice President
JIM WANG Vice President
YEON CHOI Vice President
AMY VILLANOVA Vice President
MIKE GANGEMI Vice President
BRIAN HAMILTON Vice President
CATHY OLINGER Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.