Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↓
Overall
16
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
0
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — — 16 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — 9.2% 52 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 36.8% 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 — — 26.9% 52 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 — — 22.5% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2018 — — 9.7% 58 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 7.7% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — 10.0% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — 9.9% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — 8.5% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — 8.2% 54 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 10.3% 46 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 15.7% 35 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEPHANIE WEAVER Executive Dir. 4.6% of Rev
STEVEN SCHICK Board Member 3.3% of Rev
RUBEN VALENZUELA Board Member 0.6% of Rev
BRIAN SCHOTTLAENDER Board President —
EINAR GALL Board President —
BETTY MCMANUS Board President —
RAND STEIGER Board Member —
JEANNE FERRANTE Board Member —
ERICA GAMBLE Secretary —
OLIVIA GRAEVE Board Member —
JAMES LAUTH Board Member —
PETER TAYLOR Board Member —
CATHY FUNKE Board Member —
BRIAN SCHOTTLAENDER Board President —
EINAR GALL Board President —
BETTY MCMANUS Board President —
RAND STEIGER Board Member —
JEANNE FERRANTE Board Member —
ERICA GAMBLE Secretary —
OLIVIA GRAEVE Board Member —
JAMES LAUTH Board Member —
STEPHANIE WEAVER Executive Dir. —
STEVEN SCHICK Board Member —
RUBEN VALENZUELA Board Member —
PETER TAYLOR Board Member —
CATHY FUNKE Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEPHANIE WEAVER Executive Dir. 4.4% of Rev
STEVEN SCHICK Board Member 3.1% of Rev
RUBEN VALENZUELA Board Member 1.2% of Rev
PAT FINN Board President —
BRIAN SCHOTTLAENDER Board President —
EINAR GALL Treasurer —
BETTY MCMANUS Board President —
RAND STEIGER Board Member —
JEANNE FERRANTE Board Member —
ERICA GAMBLE Secretary —
CAROL LAM Board Member —
JAMES LAUTH Board Member —
PETER TAYLOR Board Member —
CATHY FUNKE Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DIANE SALISBURY term 83019 Executive Dir. 3.0% of Rev
STEVEN SCHICK Board Member 2.7% of Rev
STEPHANIE WEAVER Beg 92319 Executive Dir. 1.2% of Rev
RUBEN VALENZUELA Board Member 0.5% of Rev
PAT FINN Board President —
BRIAN SCHOTTLAENDER Board President —
EINAR GALL Board Member —
BETTY MCMANUS Board President —
PETER GOUREVITCH Board Member —
JEANNE FERRANTE Board Member —
ERICA GAMBLE Secretary —
CATHERINE PALMER Treasurer —
PAUL SYMCZAK Board Member —
CAROL LAM Board Member —
JAMES LAUTH Board Member —
PETER TAYLOR Board Member —
MARK APPELBAUM Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
16 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,425 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 53 points below the peer median (0 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 47 → 16 over 5 years (declining by 31 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.