Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
29
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 — — 17.1% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 — — 16.6% 20 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 — — 37.8% 19 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 1.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 8.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — 12.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 39 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 2.8% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 10.9% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARC CARO-WILLCOX Board President —
DESHA CROWNOVER Board Member —
PAMELA EVERETT Treasurer —
ERIN PETERSEN Board Member —
LENELLE WYLIE Secretary —
COLE ATENCIO Board Member —
ELISSA RUSSELL Board Member —
HUNTER BROWN Board Member —
JARED JACOBS Board Member —
LUIS GARCIA Board Member —
STEVEN JENSEN Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JORDY ROSE Board Member —
ANTHONY ZELIG Board Member —
PETE SHANER Board Member —
PAMELA EVERETT Treasurer —
DESHA CROWNOVER Board Member —
TOM HAINE Board President —
BARRON HENZEL Board President —
VANESSA DINNING Board Member —
STACY MYCORN Board Member —
ROSEMARY HARRISON Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JORDY ROSE Board Member —
JORDY ROSE Board Member —
ANTHONY ZELIG Board Member —
ANTHONY ZELIG Board Member —
PETE SHANER Board Member —
PETE SHANER Board Member —
PAMELA EVERETT Treasurer —
PAMELA EVERETT Board Member —
DESHA CROWNOVER Board Member —
DESHA CROWNOVER Board Member —
TOM HAINE Board President —
STACY MYCORN Board Member —
BARRON HENZEL Board President —
KATY SKYRUD Treasurer —
VANESSA DINNING Board Member —
BARRON HENZEL Board President —
STACY MYCORN Board Member —
TOM HAINE Board President —
ROSEMARY HARRISON Board Member —
ROSEMARY HARRISON Board Member —
VANESSA DINNING Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 48 points below the peer median (5 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.