Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
32
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 10.5% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 7.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 10.5% 38 Fragile Recovery
2020 10.7% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 4.5% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 8.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 5.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 10.5% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 5.2% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 9.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 5.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 8.8% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 5.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTINE KITTINGER Board President
JUNG EUN LEE Board President
JASON MAY Treasurer
NICOLAS BREIL Secretary
RICHARD CLIFF Board President
CHRISTINE LIM Board Member
SANDI LII Board Member
IVY MEI Board Member
STEWART ELLIS Board Member
ORIT VIDAS-HOROVITZ Board Member
PATRICK DUCEY Executive Director
ALBERT THONG Board Member
DAN XUE Board Member
JESSICA ZHANG Board Member
CHRISTINE KITTINGER Board President
JUNG EUN LEE Board President
JASON MAY Treasurer
NICO BREIL Secretary
RICHARD CLIFF Board President
DAN XUE Board Member
STEWART ELLIS Board Member
JULIA HA Board Member
SANDY LII Board Member
ORIT VIDAS-HOROVITZ Board Member
PATRICK DUCEY Executive Director
ALBERT THONG Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PATRICK DUCEY Executive Director 9.7% of Rev
CHRISTINE KITTINGER Board President
JUNG EUN LEE Board President
JASON MAY Treasurer
ALBERT THONG Secretary
RICHARD CLIFF Board President
NICO BREIL Board Member
JUDY COOKS Board Member
GRACE FANG Board Member
JULIE LEE Board Member
MARIE WANG Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PATRICK DUCEY Executive Director 9.7% of Rev
PATRICK DUCEY Executive Director 7.1% of Rev
RICHARD CLIFF Board President
LORNA HARDING Board President
JASON MAY Treasurer
ALBERT THONG Secretary
GRACE FANG Board Member
SANDER GUBBENS Board Member
CHRISTINE KITTINGER Board Member
JUNG EUN LEE Board Member
JULIE LEE Board Member
KENNETH TAK Board Member
MARIE WANG Board Member
RICHARD CLIFF Board President
CHRISTINE KITTINGER Board President
JASON MAY Treasurer
ALBERT THONG Secretary
JUDY COOKS Board Member
GRACE FANG Board Member
JUNG EUN LEE Board Member
JULIE LEE Board Member
MARIE WANG Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points below the peer median (0 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.