Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
38
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 8.0% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — 4.7% 49 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 18.0% 49 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 7.8% 40 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 6.2% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — 27.9% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — 6.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 12.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 12.0% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 — — 13.7% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — 23.7% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 15.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — 8.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Steve Muterspaugh Artistic Director 8.0% of Rev
Michelle Ayoob Board Member —
Liz Buljan Board Member —
Craig Courtin Board Member —
Doris Duncan Board Member —
Saili Gosula Board President —
David Grisham Treasurer —
Richard Huebner Board Member —
Anthone Jackson Board Member —
Wendy Miller Board Member —
Janice Pickering Secretary —
Robert Sloss Board Member —
Gary Standford Jr Board Member —
Sara Steppe Board Member —
D Paul Regan Board Member —
Lisa WolfKlain Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DANIEL DEMERS Executive Director 11.1% of Rev
RANDALL O'HARA Artistic Director 6.1% of Rev
LIZ BULJAN Board Member —
CRAIG COURTIN Board Member —
DORIS DUNCAN Board Member —
SAILI GOSULA Board Member —
DAVID GRISHAM Treasurer —
ANTHONE JACKSON Board Member —
LINDA KOELLING Board Member —
JANICE PICKERING Secretary —
ROBERT SLOSS Board Member —
GARY STANFORD JR Board Member —
SARA STEPPE Board Member —
HELENA TING Board President —
MARK WATSON Board Member —
LISA WOLFKLAIN Board President —
D PAUL REGAN Board President —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAN DEMERS Executive Director 7.8% of Rev
DORIS DUNCAN Board Member —
CRAIG COURTIN Board President —
SAILI GOSULA Board Member —
ROBERT SLOSS Board Member —
SARA STEPPE Board Member —
LIZ BULJAN Board Member —
GARY STANFORD JR Board Member —
JANICE PICKERING Secretary —
DAVID GRISHAM Treasurer —
LISA WOLFKLAIN Board President —
HELENA MARIA TING EDD Board Member —
MICHELLE AYOOB Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAN DEMERS Board Member 8.0% of Rev
DORIS DUNCAN Board Member —
CRAIG COURTIN Board President —
SAILI GOSULA Board Member —
LINDA KOELLING Board Member —
ROBERT SLOSS Board Member —
SARA STEPPE Board Member —
PAUL REGAN Board President —
LIZ BULJAN Board Member —
GARY STANFORD JR Board Member —
JANICE PICKERING Secretary —
DAVID GRISHAM Treasurer —
LISA WOLFKLAIN Board President —
HELENA MARIA TING EDD Board Member —
MARK WATSON Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 43 points below the peer median (10 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.