Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↑
Overall
64
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — — 64 Stable Stable Watch
2022 — — — 56 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 48.3% 39 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 — — 16.6% 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — 15.4% 56 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — — 57 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — — 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 — — — 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 57 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GABRIELLE GREEN Board Member —
JASON TANNEN Board Member —
VICTORIA DAVILA Board Member —
RETA RICKMERS Board Member —
SADIE CARD Board Member —
NANCY BELIVEAU VOLUNTEER COORDINATOR —
LISA FREEMAN-WOOD Board President —
DANIEL DONNELLY Board President —
LYNN JACOBS Secretary —
JANA LAWTON Treasurer —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NICOLAI LARSEN Board Member —
JASON TANNEN Board Member —
VICTORIA DAVILA Board Member —
RETA RICKMERS Board Member —
LYNN JACOBS Board Member —
SADIE CARD Board Member —
NANCY BELIVEAU VOLUNTEER COORDINATOR —
LISA FREEMAN-WOOD Board President —
DANIEL DONNELLY Board President —
JEANNIE LEE SCHROEDER Secretary —
JANA LAWTON Treasurer —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAMERON KELLY GALLERY DIRE 15.8% of Rev
DEBRA SIMPSON BUSINESS MAN 14.4% of Rev
LISA FREEMAN-WOOD Board President —
DANIEL DONNELLY VICE PRESIDE —
JANA LAWTON Treasurer —
NANCY BELIVEAU Secretary —
VICTORIA DAVILA Board Member —
NICOLAI LARSEN Board Member —
JASON TANNEN Board Member —
AYE JAY MORANO Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBRA SIMPSON BUSINESS MAN 14.3% of Rev
LISA FREEMAN-WOOD Board President —
DANIEL DONNELLY VICE PRESIDE —
JANA LAWTON Treasurer —
NANCY BELIVEAU Secretary —
CAROLYN ARREDONDO Board Member —
VICTORIA DAVILA Board Member —
NICOLAI LARSEN Board Member —
JASON TANNEN Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAMERON KELLY GALLERY DIR 11.3% of Rev
CAROLYN ARREDONDO Board Member —
DANIEL DONNELLY Board President —
NICOLAI LARSEN Board Member —
NANCY BELIVEAU Secretary —
JANA LAWTON Treasurer —
VICTORIA DAVILA Board Member —
LISA FREEMAN-WOOD Board President —
JASON TANNEN Board Member —
SADIE CARD Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
64 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,425 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 37 points above the peer median (90 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.