Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
23
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 44.5% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 9.2% 37 Fragile Recovery
2021 27.3% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 24.9% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 9.0% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 10.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 43 Fragile Recovery
2014 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 41 Fragile Recovery
2012 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Janice Amaya Board Member 7.0% of Rev
NATALIE GERSHTEIN Board Member 6.0% of Rev
Graham Johnson Board Member
Lindsey Cosgrove Chairman
Ashley Garrett Board Member
BEN LASSER Treasurer
JASON BARUCH Board Member
Adam Hyndman Board Member
Jesse Alick Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NATALIE GERSHTEIN Artistic Director 17.2% of Rev
Kristin Bodall Treasurer 11.9% of Rev
Janice Amaya Board Member 0.7% of Rev
Graham Johnson Board Member
Lindsey Cosgrove Treasurer
Ashley Garrett Board Member
BEN LASSER Chairman
JASON BARUCH Board Member
Adam Hyndman Board Member
Jesse Alick Board Member
Monique St Cyr Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NATALIE GERSHTEIN Board Member 17.2% of Rev
Kristin Bodall Treasurer 4.1% of Rev
BEN LASSER Chairman
JASON BARUCH Board Member
Graham Johnson Board Member
Lindsey Cosgrove Treasurer
Ashley Garrett Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NATALIE GERSHTEIN Board Member 16.9% of Rev
Kristin Bodall Treasurer 4.6% of Rev
Graham Johnson Board Member
Lindsey Cosgrove Treasurer
Ashley Garrett Board Member
BEN LASSER Chairman
JASON BARUCH Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
23 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 16 points below the peer median (15 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 44.5% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.