Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
32
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — — 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 — — — 40 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 — — 1.6% 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 — — 2.0% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 — — 2.4% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CARMA ZISMAN EXECUTIVE DI 28.7% of Rev
BRENDA WAY Artistic Director 19.4% of Rev
BECKY SAEGER Board President —
JACKIE SCHNEIDER Board President —
MARY MARGARET JONES Board President —
BART DEAMER Treasurer —
SALLY X YU CHIEF INVEST —
CECILIA FOK Secretary —
ANNA BOYER Board Member —
SEAN DOWDALL Board Member —
PAMELA DUFFY Board Member —
HENRY ERLICH Board Member —
JUSTIN ERLICH Board Member —
LYNN FEINTECH Board Member —
MARLENE WILLIAMS FORD Board Member —
MICHELLE HANSEN Board Member —
CAROLYN HUTCHINSON Board Member —
SUZIE IVELICH Board Member —
KT NELSON Board Member —
KIMI OKADA SCHOOL DIREC —
TIM SCHROEDER Board Member —
TIMOTHY STREB Board Member —
HEATHER TAY Board Member —
PAMELA WRIGHT Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BECKY SAEGER Board President —
Mary Margaret Jones Board President —
Bart Deamer Treasurer —
Cecilia Fok Secretary —
Lynn Feintech Board Member —
Jackie Schneider Board Member —
BRENDA WAY Artistic Director —
ALYCE DISSETTE Board Member —
Anna Boyer Board Member —
Sean Dowdall Board Member —
Henry Erlich Board Member —
Justin Erlich Board Member —
Michelle Hansen Board Member —
Carolyn Goor Hutchinson Board Member —
CARMA M ZISMAN EXECUTIVE DIR. —
CATHERINE Nelson Artistic Director —
KIMI OKADA Board Member —
Suzie Ivelich Board Member —
Tim Schroeder Board Member —
David Slater Board Member —
Timothy Streb Board Member —
Heather Tay Board Member —
Margaret Tcheng Ware Board Member —
Samantha Test Cauthen Board Member —
Pamela Wright Board Member —
Sally X Yu Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,425 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 53 points below the peer median (0 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 32 → 32 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.