Governance Lag
What does this mean?
Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.
The Path Forward
The Scaffold
Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 23 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch | |
| 2010 | — | — | — | 23 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2026
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Wilcox | Board President | — | ||
| Josh Sandoz | Secretary | — | ||
| Philip Lloyd | Treasurer | — | ||
| Jamie Balducci | Board Member | — | ||
| Carl Bolstad | Board Member | — | ||
| James Buskirk | Board Member | — | ||
| Estephen Meza | Board Member | — | ||
| Vernon Nicodemus | Board Member | — | ||
| Joel Bevington | Board Member | — | ||
| Joey Blundell | Board Member | — | ||
| Jason Anderson | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Wilcox | Board President | — | ||
| Josh Sandoz | Board Member | — | ||
| Philip Lloyd | Treasurer | — | ||
| Jamie Balducci | Board Member | — | ||
| Carl Bolstad | Board Member | — | ||
| James Buskirk | Board Member | — | ||
| Estephen Meza | Board Member | — | ||
| Vernon Nicodemus | Board Member | — | ||
| Joel Bevington | Board Member | — | ||
| Joey Blundell | Board Member | — | ||
| Jason Anderson | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 235 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points below the peer median (15 vs. 32).
5-year trend: Governance Lag
Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.