Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↑
Overall
44
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 14.2% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — 13.8% 48 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 15.1% 51 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 10.8% 44 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 — — 7.8% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — 8.7% 48 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 9.7% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — 9.2% 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 — — 8.2% 42 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 — — 10.1% 45 Fragile Gov Risk
2013 — — 9.6% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 — — 7.8% 54 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 8.6% 50 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Josh Costello Artistic Director 5.6% of Rev
Josh Costello Artistic Director 4.9% of Rev
Robin Dolan Executive Director 4.4% of Rev
Nicole Schulz Executive Director 4.2% of Rev
Robin Dolan Executive Director 4.0% of Rev
Rebecca Parlette-Edwards Board President —
Rosalind Kim Interim V.P. —
Tom Worth Treasurer —
Alan Miller Secretary —
Daria Hepps Board Member —
Kinman Tong Board Member —
Rebecca Parlette-Edwards Board President —
Rosalind Kim Interim V.P. —
Tom Worth Treasurer —
Alan Miller Secretary —
Kinman Tong Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Josh Costello Artistic Director 5.7% of Rev
Sharon Dolan Interim Man Dir 3.5% of Rev
Nicole Schulz Business Mgr 3.5% of Rev
Francesca Gabourel Board Member 2.1% of Rev
Lance Gardner Board President —
Gertrude Allen Board President —
Rebecca Parlette-Edwards Treasurer —
George Hisert Secretary —
Rosalind Kim Board Member —
Alan Miller Board Member —
Craig Moody Board Member —
Edward Schneider Board Member —
Kinman Tong Board Member —
Tom Worth Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Julie Saltzman Kellner Executive Director 5.3% of Rev
Josh Costello Artistic Director 4.5% of Rev
Joan Catherine Braun Board President —
Kitt Shute Board President —
Rebecca Parlette-Edwards Treasurer —
George Hisert Secretary —
Gertrude Allen Board Member —
Elizabeth Burwell Board Member —
Lance Gardner Board Member —
Ellen Levine Board Member —
Rosalind Kim Board Member —
Craig Moody Board Member —
Ed Schneider Board Member —
Kinman Tong Board Member —
Tom Worth Board Member —
Sharon Dolan Interim E.D. —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Julie Saltzman Kellner Executive Director 5.1% of Rev
Josh Costello Artistic Director 3.1% of Rev
Gary H Moore Board President —
Ellen B Levine Board President —
Edward Schneider Treasurer —
George Hisert Secretary —
Joan Catherine Braun Board Member —
Elizabeth Burwell Board Member —
Lance Gardner Board Member —
Deborah S Goodman Board Member —
Rosalind Kim Board Member —
Craig Moody Board Member —
Rebecca Parlette-Edwards Board Member —
Ed Schneider Board Member —
Kitt Shute Board Member —
Sallie Weissinger Board Member —
Tom Worth Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.