Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
44
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 44 Fragile Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden 51 Fragile Recovery
2019 47 Fragile Recovery
2018 43 Fragile Recovery
2017 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 43 Fragile Recovery
2015 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALI MOTO Board President
NICOLE FERGUSON Treasurer
LEM REAGAN Board Member
ALIA KELLEY Board Member
LIBBY SCHMOEGER Board Member
JACOB RAMEY Board Member
YUREK HANSEN Artistic Director
NATHAN POWELL Artistic Director
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 18 other orgs in ID with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 22 points above the peer median (50 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.