Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | 49.1% | 40 | Governance-Stressed | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 37 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 37 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 43 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 29 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 29 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 33 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2022
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winda I Shimizu | Executive Director | 62.2% of Rev | ||
| Jeanne Bertolina | HAC Board Webmaster | — | ||
| Milt Bowerman | Board Member | — | ||
| Russell Foote | Board Member | — | ||
| Edward Keller | Treasurer | — | ||
| Lani Llamado | Board Member | — | ||
| Karla Lopez | Board Member | — | ||
| Al Murdach | Board Member | — | ||
| Patra Nesseth-Steffes | Board Member | — | ||
| Suzanne Phillis | Secretary | — | ||
| Heather Reyes | Board President | — | ||
| Bruce Roberts | Board President | — | ||
| Jayendra Singh | Board Member | — | ||
| Gerald Thompson | Board Member | — | ||
| Winnie Thompson | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 26 points below the peer median (5 vs. 31).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 37 → 41 over 5 years (improving by 4 points).
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
- Two consecutive years of deficit spending.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.