Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

"Brings world-class ballet to Utah and beyond, while educating the community on the value of dance and offering participation opportunities for all ages."

— Statement of Program Service Accomplishments

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller

Demonstrated Impact

  • thousands of man-hours in donated time
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
35
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2022 — — — 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2021 — — — 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2020 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRUCE MILLER Board President —
ANGELLA VERNON Board President —
ELLEN CHRISTENSON Board President —
VICKY HOPPER Treasurer —
JACQUELINE P COLLEDGE FOUNDER —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRUCE MILLER Board President —
ANGELLA VERNON Board President —
ELLEN CHRISTENSON Board President —
VICKY HOPPER Treasurer —
JACQUELINE P COLLEDGE FOUNDER —
BRUCE MILLER Board President —
ANGELLA VERNON Board President —
ELLEN CHRISTENSON Board President —
VICKY HOPPER Treasurer —
JACQUELINE P COLLEDGE FOUNDER —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRUCE MILLER Board President —
DAVE PETERSSON Board Member —
ELLEN CHRISTENSON Board President —
VICKY HOPPER Treasurer —
JACQUELINE P COLLEDGE FOUNDER —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SHAWN MOON EXECUTIVE CH —
VICKY HOPPER Secretary —
ASHLEY CHRISTENSON Treasurer —
JACQUELINE P COLLEDGE Artistic Director —
ELLEN CHRISTENSON BOARD PRESID —
MICHELLE MOON Board Member —
DANIELLE ADAMS Board Member —
BRUCE MILLER Board Member —
STEVEN CARTER Board Member —
NICOLE BROWN Board Member —
NICOLE ORTEGA Board Member —
ASHLEY GLEASON Board Member —
DENISE MOWER Board Member —
RYAN RICHARDSON Board Member —
PAUL RICHARDSON Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 114 other orgs in UT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 46 points below the peer median (0 vs. 46).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.