Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 47 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 16.4% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 35.7% 48 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 — — 43.5% 44 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 — — — 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — — 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 — — — 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — — 53 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOSEPH PIAZZA Board Member 17.0% of Rev
RANDALL KIKUKAWA Treasurer 10.2% of Rev
FRED CUMMINS ACCOMPANIST 3.8% of Rev
RICHARD ROSSER Executive Director —
LAWRENCE NOVIDA Secretary —
SETH COAD-DOUGLASS Board President —
GIACOMO DIGRIGOLI Board President —
SANDRA DOUGLASS Board President —
JOHANN JOSON Board Member —
DAVID PRIEST Board President —
WILL ZHANG Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOSEPH PIAZZA Board Member 17.0% of Rev
RANDALL KIKUKAWA Treasurer 10.2% of Rev
FRED CUMMINS ACCOMPANIST 3.8% of Rev
RICHARD ROSSER Executive Director —
LAWRENCE NOVIDA Secretary —
SETH COAD-DOUGLASS Board President —
GIACOMO DIGRIGOLI Board President —
SANDRA DOUGLASS Board President —
JOHANN JOSON Board Member —
DAVID PRIEST Board President —
WILL ZHANG Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOSEPH PIAZZA Board Member 11.4% of Rev
RANDALL KIKUKAWA Treasurer 9.1% of Rev
RICHARD ROSSER Executive Director —
STEPHEN SIMKO Secretary —
SETH COAD-DOUGLASS Board President —
DAVID PRIEST Board President —
GIACOMO DIGRIGOLI Board President —
KARL BROWN Board President —
SANDRA DOUGLASS Board President —
ERIC NEFSTEAD Board Member —
LAWRENCE NOVIDA Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOSEPH PIAZZA Board Member 14.6% of Rev
RANDALL KIKUKAWA Treasurer 8.8% of Rev
FRED CUMMINS ACCOMPANIST 3.2% of Rev
RICHARD ROSSER Executive Director —
STEPHEN SIMKO Secretary —
SETH COAD-DOUGLASS Board President —
KENN KEITT Board President —
DAVID PRIEST Board President —
GIACOMO DIGRIGOLI Board President —
KARL BROWN Board President —
SANDRA DOUGLASS Board President —
ERIC NEFSTEAD Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOSEPH PIAZZA Board Member 14.6% of Rev
JOSEPH PIAZZA Board Member 14.6% of Rev
RANDALL KIKUKAWA Treasurer 8.8% of Rev
RANDALL KIKUKAWA Treasurer 8.8% of Rev
FRED CUMMINS ACCOMPANIST 3.2% of Rev
FRED CUMMINS ACCOMPANIST 3.2% of Rev
RICHARD ROSSER Executive Director —
STEPHEN SIMKO Secretary —
ANDREW BERGER Board Member —
HOWARD CHAN Board President —
SETH COAD-DOUGLASS Board President —
KENN KEITT Board President —
DAVID PRIEST Board President —
GIACOMO DIGRIGOLI Board President —
KARL BROWN Board Member —
RICHARD ROSSER Board Member —
STEPHEN SIMKO Secretary —
ANDREW BERGER Board Member —
HOWARD CHAN Board President —
SETH COAD-DOUGLASS Board President —
KENN KEITT Board President —
DAVID PRIEST Board President —
GIACOMO DIGRIGOLI Board President —
KARL BROWN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,425 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 14 points below the peer median (50 vs. 64).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.