Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — — 39 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 42 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 50 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 38 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 — — — 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2010 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBRA COLLETTI Board President —
GABE HANZELI Board President —
WILLIAM VILLASENOR Treasurer —
BRIAN CHASE Secretary —
CECILIA AGUERRE Board Member —
ELSA BEHNEY Board Member —
JOHN BRONDELLO Board Member —
CLAUDIA CASTA-PECORA Board Member —
MICHAEL SCOTT FEELEY Board Member —
GILBERT GEMBACZ Board Member —
MARIA GRANT Board Member —
GEORGY HAWLEY Board Member —
MARICIA HOBBS Board Member —
KATHLEEN HUSTON Board Member —
JOHN MCDONNELL JR Board Member —
MICHAEL MOLINA Board Member —
ANDRIA PINKOWSKI Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBRA COLLETTI Board President —
GABE HANZELI Board President —
KAPIL MAHENDRA Treasurer —
BRIAN CHASE Secretary —
CECILIA AGUERRE Board Member —
ELSA BEHNEY Board Member —
MICHAEL SCOTT FEELEY Board Member —
MARIA GRANT Board Member —
GEORGE HAWLEY Board Member —
KATHLEEN HUSTON Board Member —
JOHN L MCDONNELL JR Board Member —
MARCIA HOBBS Board Member —
KRISTAN O'DONNELL Board Member —
CLAUDIA PERCORA Board Member —
ANDRIA PINKOWSKI Board Member —
SHERRY VAN METER Board Member —
BILL VILLASENOR Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMES E R LOW Board President —
BRIAN CHASE Secretary —
KAPIL MAHENDRA Treasurer —
DEBRA COLLETTI Board President —
BARBARA WILSEY Board Member —
BILL VILLASENOR Board Member —
BRIAN MATTHEWS Board Member —
CLAUDIA PERCORA Board Member —
GABE HANZELI Board Member —
GREG STANISLAWSKI Board Member —
JOHN L MCDONNELL JR Board Member —
KATHLEEN HUSTON Board Member —
KRISTAN O'DONNELL Board Member —
MARCIA HOBBS Board Member —
MARIA GRANT Board Member —
MICHAEL SCOTT FEELEY Board Member —
MONICA FISCHBECK Board Member —
SHERRY VAN METER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 163 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 44 points below the peer median (25 vs. 69).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.