Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 47 Fragile Recovery
2022 65.5% 40 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 39 Fragile Recovery
2020 26.3% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2019 47 Fragile Recovery
2018 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 47 Fragile Recovery
2016 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 47 Fragile Recovery
2013 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Matt Wolka Executive Direc 56.9% of Rev
Walter Kennedy Board Member
Christopher Burt Board Member
Mike Tekulsky Board Member
Darren Presher Treasurer
Barbara Marre Board Member
Donna Kline Board Member
James Riggs Board Member
Thomas Culp Board President
Krisanthy Desby Board Member
Randal Wong Secretary
Steve Taber Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Matt Wolka Executive Direc 33.3% of Rev
Walter Kennedy Board Member
Christopher Burt Board Member
Mike Tekulsky Board Member
Darren Presher Treasurer
Barbara Marre Board Member
Meina Xu Board Member
Bill Rudiak Board Member
Thomas Culp Board President
Randal Wong Secretary
Steve Taber Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 22 points above the peer median (55 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

Overall score has gone from 47 → 47 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.