Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
40
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
20
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 11.5% 40 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 7.2% 44 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 11.1% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 9.2% 44 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 8.3% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 — — 6.7% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 — — 8.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — 8.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 6.8% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 — — 5.7% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 — — 11.4% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JACQUELINE M ATCHISON Executive Director 6.9% of Rev
JACQUELINE M ATCHISON Executive Director 6.9% of Rev
KARYN LEE CHIEF PROGRAMS OFFICER 4.7% of Rev
KARYN LEE CHIEF PROGRAMS OFFICER 4.7% of Rev
LAURIE BEND Board President —
NATALIE RAVA CPA Treasurer —
CHRISTOPHER LONG ESQ Secretary —
PETER KASAVAN Board Member —
ROSEMARY SOTO Board Member —
SANDIE BORTHWICK Board Member —
TJ PLEW Board Member —
KIRAN KAMATH Board Member —
HUGH SMITH Board Member —
MICHAEL GUTIERREZ Board Member —
ALEXIS GARCIA-ARRAZOLA Board Member —
LAURIE BEND Board President —
NATALIE RAVA CPA Treasurer —
CHRISTOPHER LONG ESQ Secretary —
PETER KASAVAN Board Member —
ROSEMARY SOTO Board Member —
SANDIE BORTHWICK Board Member —
TJ PLEW Board Member —
KIRAN KAMATH Board Member —
HUGH SMITH Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JACQUIE ATCHISON Executive Director 5.5% of Rev
LAURIE BEND Chairman —
ERIC MORA Board Member —
ROSEMARY SOTO Board Member —
KIRAN KAMATH Board Member —
CHRIS LONG Secretary —
CHARLOTTE RADMILOVIC Board Member —
JANET MARTINEZ-ANGELES Board Member —
TJ PLEW Board Member —
NATALIE RAVA Treasurer —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JACQUIE ATCHISON Executive Director 5.2% of Rev
LAURIE BEND Chairman —
ERIC MORA Secretary —
SUSIE BRUSA Board Member —
KIRAN KAMATH Board Member —
CHRIS LONG Board Member —
HOLLY BYERS OCHOA Treasurer —
JANET MARTINEZ-ANGELES Board Member —
RON CACAS Board Member —
TJ PLEW-HEARNE Board Member —
NATALIE RAVA Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JACQUIE ATCHISON Executive Director 4.6% of Rev
LAURIE BEND Board President —
ERIC MORA Board Member —
NICOLLETTE EASON TROTTIER Board Member —
JOE FRAUSTO Board Member —
SEAN SEEBACH Board Member —
HOLLY BYERS OCHOA Treasurer —
CATHRYN WILKINSON Board Member —
RON CACAS Board Member —
JOSE MORAN Chairman —
MARILYN VIERRA Secretary —
SARAH BOOS Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
20 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
40 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,023 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 52 points below the peer median (20 vs. 72).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.