Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
35
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 3.5% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — 2.9% 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 7.0% 46 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 — — 3.6% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — 4.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — 4.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — 4.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — 3.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — 4.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — 3.0% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — 0.2% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Randy Barton Board Member 3.3% of Rev
Jennifer Silva Board Member 2.3% of Rev
Donna Tyus Schaufert Board Member —
Mitchel Burns Board Member —
Mark Abbott Board Member —
Joy Soll Board Member —
David Camarata Board President —
Ellen Hendrickson Secretary —
Gretchen Rubell Board President —
Kathy Stepp Treasurer —
Lyn Fey Historian —
Randy Sikora Strategic Planning —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Randy Barton Board Member 3.5% of Rev
David Camarata Board Member —
Donna Tyus Schaufert Board Member —
Ellen Hendrickson Governance Committee —
Gretchen Rubell Board President —
Jamie Cervelli Secretary —
Kathy Stepp Board President —
Kaylene Kotter Treasurer —
Lynn Fey Historian —
Mitchel Burns Board Member —
Randy Sikora Strategic Planning —
Mark Abbott Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RANDY BARTON THEATRE DIRE 3.5% of Rev
JOEL SHINE Board President —
KATHY STEPP VICE PRESIDE —
KAYLENE KOTTER Treasurer —
GRETCHEN RUBELL Secretary —
ANDREW COHEN Board Member —
MORGAN LEMAITRE Board Member —
LYNN FEY Board Member —
RANDY SIKORA Board Member —
PETER ZACCAGNINO Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREW COHEN Board President —
MORGAN LEMAITRE VICE PRESIDE —
LESLIE GOLDMAN Secretary —
GRETCHEN RUBELL Secretary —
KAYLENE KOTTER Treasurer —
MITCHEL BURNS Board Member —
JOEL SHINE Board Member —
ELLEN HENDRICKSON Board Member —
LYNN FEY Board Member —
MANDY FORBES Board Member —
RANDY SIKORA Board Member —
KATHY STEPP Board Member —
PETER ZACCAGNINO Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RANDY BARTON EXECUTIVE DI 2.9% of Rev
TOM EASTWOOD Board Member —
LYNN FEY Board Member —
MANDY FORBES Board Member —
NOAH LEVINE Board Member —
JOEL SHINE Board Member —
MITCHEL BURNS Board President —
BLAKE CHRISTIAN Treasurer —
ANDREW COHEN Board President —
ELLEN HENDRICKSON Secretary —
MORGAN IRVIN VICE PRESIDE —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 114 other orgs in UT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 46 points below the peer median (0 vs. 46).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.