Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
35
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 3.5% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 2.9% 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 7.0% 46 Fragile Recovery
2020 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 3.6% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 4.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 4.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 4.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 3.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 4.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 3.0% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 0.2% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Randy Barton Board Member 3.3% of Rev
Jennifer Silva Board Member 2.3% of Rev
Donna Tyus Schaufert Board Member
Mitchel Burns Board Member
Mark Abbott Board Member
Joy Soll Board Member
David Camarata Board President
Ellen Hendrickson Secretary
Gretchen Rubell Board President
Kathy Stepp Treasurer
Lyn Fey Historian
Randy Sikora Strategic Planning

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Randy Barton Board Member 3.5% of Rev
David Camarata Board Member
Donna Tyus Schaufert Board Member
Ellen Hendrickson Governance Committee
Gretchen Rubell Board President
Jamie Cervelli Secretary
Kathy Stepp Board President
Kaylene Kotter Treasurer
Lynn Fey Historian
Mitchel Burns Board Member
Randy Sikora Strategic Planning
Mark Abbott Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RANDY BARTON THEATRE DIRE 3.5% of Rev
JOEL SHINE Board President
KATHY STEPP VICE PRESIDE
KAYLENE KOTTER Treasurer
GRETCHEN RUBELL Secretary
ANDREW COHEN Board Member
MORGAN LEMAITRE Board Member
LYNN FEY Board Member
RANDY SIKORA Board Member
PETER ZACCAGNINO Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREW COHEN Board President
MORGAN LEMAITRE VICE PRESIDE
LESLIE GOLDMAN Secretary
GRETCHEN RUBELL Secretary
KAYLENE KOTTER Treasurer
MITCHEL BURNS Board Member
JOEL SHINE Board Member
ELLEN HENDRICKSON Board Member
LYNN FEY Board Member
MANDY FORBES Board Member
RANDY SIKORA Board Member
KATHY STEPP Board Member
PETER ZACCAGNINO Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RANDY BARTON EXECUTIVE DI 2.9% of Rev
TOM EASTWOOD Board Member
LYNN FEY Board Member
MANDY FORBES Board Member
NOAH LEVINE Board Member
JOEL SHINE Board Member
MITCHEL BURNS Board President
BLAKE CHRISTIAN Treasurer
ANDREW COHEN Board President
ELLEN HENDRICKSON Secretary
MORGAN IRVIN VICE PRESIDE
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 81 other orgs in UT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points below the peer median (0 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.