Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
22
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 64.4% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 36.1% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2021 27.7% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 37.0% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 36.4% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 9.4% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 4.6% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 28.5% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 37.3% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 42.2% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Elena Gross Executive Dir. 23.7% of Rev
Kim Arteche Executive Dir. 21.5% of Rev
Eric Cabunoc Board President
Jessica Abbott Williams Board Member
Kerri Hurtado Board President
Beatriz Mejia Board Member
Galen Melchert Board Member
Svea Lin Soll Treasurer
Jessica Tschirki Secretary
Thet Shein Win Board Member
Nat Amare Board Member
Alex Morrison Board Member
Jyoti Argade Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kim Arteche Board President 24.7% of Rev
Elena Gross Board President 13.2% of Rev
Daniel Nevers Board President 11.9% of Rev
Shawn HibmaCronan Board President
Alex Morrison Board Member
Eric Cabunoc Secretary
Jessica Abbott Williams Board Member
Kerri Hurtado Board President
Beatriz Mejia Board Member
Weston Teruya Board President
Svea Lin Soll Treasurer
Jessica Tschirki Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Daniel Nevers Executive Dir. 27.9% of Rev
Kelsey Nicholson Board President
Margaret OConnor Board Member
Jessica Cadkin Board Member
Shawn HibmaCronan Board President
Henry Parsons Board President
Laili Gohartaj Treasurer
Eric Cabunoc Secretary
Kerri Hurtado Board Member
Jessica Abbott Williams Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
22 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points below the peer median (0 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 64.4% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.