Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
39
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
20
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2021 15.8% 39 Fragile Recovery
2020 19.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 19.1% 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 15.3% 41 Fragile Recovery
2017 24.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 19.6% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 15.5% 37 Fragile Recovery
2014 19.1% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 19.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 42.9% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 34.4% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Cristine Kelly Executive Dir. 8.8% of Rev
Keri Butkevich Executive Dir. 7.1% of Rev
Patrick Zimski Board President
Davey Warner Treasurer
Monica LaBoskey Board Member
Andrew Chung Board Member
Tina Flores Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Keri Butkevich Executive Dir. 18.0% of Rev
Patrick Zimski Board President
Tina Flores Secretary
Davey Warner Treasurer
Brandon Best Board President
Andrew Chung Board Member
Monica Laboskey Board Member
Kristen Brun Treasurer
Lori Marion Board Member
Darbi Howard Board Member
Latrice Howard Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
20 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 27 → 39 over 5 years (improving by 12 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.