Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
38
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 29.0% 38 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2023 19.5% 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 20.9% 43 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 25.3% 42 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 26.4% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2019 21.1% 37 Fragile Gov Risk
2018 25.4% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 23.0% 37 Fragile Recovery
2016 6.0% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 6.8% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 42.3% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 37.1% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 32.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2011 27.8% 36 Fragile Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FRANCES LEE Board President
HALLIE HOLTZMAN Board President
TIM SMITH Secretary
SALLY NIELSEN Treasurer
MAURA CHURCH Board Member
BUCK FARMER Board Member
RENA DAVIS Board Member
BETTY LUK Board Member
JUDITH STONE Board Member
WILL WELCH Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SCOTT STAUFFER Board President
KELSEY MENEHAN Board President
JANE GITSCHIER Secretary
CAROL HENRI Treasurer
MAURA CHURCH Board Member
BUCK FARMER Board Member
LOUIS LAO Board Member
SARAH JELLEY Board Member
SUSAN POOR Board Member
TIM SMITH Board Member
JUDITH STONE Board Member
FRANCES LEE Board Member
MARTHA WESTLAND Executive Director
SCOTT STAUFFER Board President
HALLIE HOLTZMAN Board President
FRANCES LEE Secretary
CAROL HENRI Treasurer
MAURA CHURCH Board Member
BUCK FARMER Board Member
SARAH JELLEY Board Member
SUSAN POOR Board Member
TIM SMITH Board Member
JUDITH STONE Board Member
WILL WELCH Board Member
MARTHA WESTLAND Executive Director

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARTHA WESTLAND Executive Director 23.7% of Rev
DR PATRICIA BELL Board President
KELSEY MENEHAN Board President
SCOTT STAUFFER Secretary
CAROL HENRI Treasurer
MAURA CHURCH Board Member
DEAN EBESU Board Member
BUCK FARMER Board Member
RITA FREIMANIS Board Member
JANE GITSCHIER Board Member
SARAH JELLEY Board Member
LOUIS LAO Board Member
JUDITH STONE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARTHA WESTLAND Executive Director 22.4% of Rev
DR PATRICIA BELL Board President
KELSEY MENEHAN Board President
SCOTT STAUFFER Secretary
CAROL HENRI Treasurer
DEAN EBESU Board Member
BUCK FARMER Board Member
RITA FREIMANIS Board Member
SARAH JELLEY Board Member
LOUIS LAO Board Member
SALLY NIELSEN Board Member
VANCE MAVERICK Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 14 points above the peer median (45 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 29.0% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~14 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.