Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
27
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 15.4% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 5.1% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 1.8% 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 16.1% 20 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 4.2% 42 Fragile Recovery
2018 10.7% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 5.4% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 37 Fragile Recovery
2015 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2010 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALMA LOPEZ Board President
MAX VARGAS Board President
JUSTIN MATA Secretary
MARINA SERVANTEZ Treasurer
DAVID BISCHOFF Board Member
RAQUELA MEJIA Board Member
CANDELARIA VARGAS Board Member
DAVID BANUELOS Board Member
MARTA INDUNI Board Member
ARMANDO BOTELLO Board Member
JORGE RUIZ Board Member
MARIE ACOSTA Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARIE ACOSTA EXECUTIVE DI 3.9% of Rev
TERRY PALACIOS Board President
AIDA PEREZ Secretary
DAVID BISCHOFF Board Member
GABRIEL CRUZ VIVAS Board Member
BREE GARCIA Board Member
CARISSA GUTIERREZ Board Member
RAQUELA MEJA Board Member
BEATRIZ NAVARRO Board Member
MARINA RIVERA Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARIE ACOSTA EXECUTIVE DI 8.7% of Rev
CARISSA GUTIERREZ Board President
AIDA PEREZ Secretary
TERRY PALACIOS Board Member
DAVID BISCHOFF Board Member
BREE GARCIA Board Member
GABRIEL CRUZ VIVAS Board Member
RAQUELA MEJA Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARIE ACOSTA EXECUTIVE DI 4.3% of Rev
TERRY PALACIOS Board President
AIDA PEREZ Secretary
DAVID BISCHOFF Board Member
GABRIEL CRUS VIVAS Board Member
BREE GARCIA Board Member
CARISSA GUTIERREZ Board Member
CARLOS MONTES-PONCE Board Member
BEATRIZ NAVARRO Board Member
SANDRA OLSZEWSKI Board Member
MARIANNA RIVERA Board Member
XOCHITL TAFOYO Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
27 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 171 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 29 points below the peer median (5 vs. 34).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.