Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
34
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 42 Fragile Recovery
2021 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 45 Fragile Recovery
2019 42 Fragile Recovery
2018 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CARMEN BRAMMER Board Member
STEVE KAPLOWITZ Board Member
KRISEN PETTIT Board Member
MICHELLE YASUDA Board Member
MICHAEL HOWERTON Board President
MARJI KARLGAARD Board President
BRANDON LEWKE Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LEE FORBES Board Member
STEVE KAPLOWITZ Board Member
BRANDON LEWKE Board Member
STINO TAPIA Board Member
MICHELLE YASUDA Board Member
MARJI KARLGAARD VICE PRESIDE
KRISEN PETTIT Treasurer
ELIZABETH SWEENEY Secretary
ANN TIMONEY Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 42 → 34 over 5 years (declining by 8 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.