Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
35
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 3.9% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — 5.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 7.6% 50 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 5.3% 40 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 5.0% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — 4.8% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — 4.8% 41 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 7.0% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 — — 6.8% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — 5.8% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 — — 5.4% 42 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 — — 5.6% 44 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2011 — — 4.7% 45 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Stephen Wilson Executive Director 3.7% of Rev
W F Docker Board Member —
Larry King Board President —
Byrne Finkle Board Member —
Henry Barkett Board Member —
Thomas Hunt Board Member —
Ben Krikorian Board President —
Patricia Towne Board Member —
Michael Chappell Secretary —
David A Fox Board Member —
Nicholas H Rasmussen Board Member —
Caren Myers Board President —
Jane Bedrosian Board Member —
Christine Hardcastle Board Member —
Curtis Wong Treasurer —
Elizabeth Looney Board Member —
Bernard Karian Board Member —
JD Northway Board Member —
Daniel Stein Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Stephen Wilson Executive Director 3.8% of Rev
W F Docker Board Member —
Larry King Board Member —
Byrne Finkle Board Member —
Henry Barkett Board Member —
Thomas Hunt Board Member —
Ben Krikorian Board President —
Patricia Towne Board Member —
Michael Chappell Secretary —
David A Fox Board Member —
Nicholas H Rasmussen Board Member —
Caren Myers Board President —
Jane Bedrosian Board Member —
Christine Hardcastle Board Member —
Curtis Wong Treasurer —
Elizabeth Looney Board Member —
Bernard Karian Board Member —
JD Northway Board Member —
Daniel Stein Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Stephen Wilson Executive Director 4.0% of Rev
James Prochazka Board Member —
Larry King Board Member —
Peter Smits Board Member —
Henry Barkett Board Member —
Kevork Oflazian Board Member —
Judith Peracchi Board President —
Robert Ware Board Member —
Michael Chappell Secretary —
David A Fox Board Member —
Nicholas H Rasmussen Board Member —
Caren Myers Board President —
Jane Bedrosian Board Member —
Christine Hardcastle Board Member —
Curtis Wong Treasurer —
Judith Kuipers Board Member —
Elizabeth Looney Board Member —
Ben Krikorian Board Member —
Bernard Karian Board Member —
JD Northway Board Member —
Margaret Desmond Hughes Board Member —
Daniel Stein Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 53 points below the peer median (0 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 37 → 35 over 5 years (declining by 2 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.