Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
30
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 36.8% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 28.5% 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 12.8% 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 6.2% 43 Fragile Recovery
2019 23.3% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 19.8% 35 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 24.3% 35 Fragile Gov Risk
2016 19.7% 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 15.5% 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 16.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 16.5% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 16.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Joella Oldfield Executive Director 20.4% of Rev
Karrie Morrison Board President 13.2% of Rev
Jeannie Johnson Secretary
Carla Morrison Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Joella Oldfield Executive Director 12.2% of Rev
Barbara Hiatt Treasurer
Jeannie Johnson Secretary
Karrie Morrison Board President
Carla Morrison Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Joella Oldfield Executive Director 2.2% of Rev
Karrie Morrison Board President 1.7% of Rev
Jeannie Johnson Secretary
Barbara Hiatt Treasurer
Carla Morrison Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
30 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 25 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 23 points below the peer median (15 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 31 → 30 over 5 years (declining by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 36.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~30 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.