Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
33
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 41 Fragile Recovery
2020 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 43 Fragile Recovery
2018 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 47 Fragile Recovery
2016 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Matthew Zook Administrative Coordinator 19.7% of Rev
Matthew Myers Artistic Director 19.6% of Rev
Elena Panchenko Accompanist 9.2% of Rev
Atom Allison Administrative Coordinator 6.9% of Rev
Stephanie Sant Board Member 4.5% of Rev
Darcy Howser Board Member 2.2% of Rev
Deborah Collins Childrens Choir Accompanist 0.4% of Rev
Anneliese Zook Board President
Gillian Sharma Board President
Deborah Collins Secretary
Jordan Hardy Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 235 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points below the peer median (15 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.