Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation
Overall
85
Score
Governance
85
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 5.9% 50 Fragile Recovery
2022 11.8% 48 Fragile Recovery
2019 41 Fragile Recovery
2018 7.2% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 18.0% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 23.8% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 15.3% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 13.2% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 15.1% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 5.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 9.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Carolyn Ramo Executive Director 4.1% of Rev
Patton Hindle Executive Dir. 1.7% of Rev
Ian Alteveer Board Member
Susan Bridges Board Member
Nick Cave Board Member
Joelle Connolly Board Member
Aurele Danoff Pelaia Board President
Laura Roberson Fisch Board President
Oliver Frankel Treasurer
Eugene Fu Board Member
Mary Kemper Wolf Board Member
John Guess Board Member
Tony Karman Board Member
Naima Keith Board Member
Lucy Kim Board Member
Jennie Lamensdorf Board Member
Karen Mehiel Board Member
Matthew Newton Board Member
Kes Narbutas Board Member
Judy Nyquist Officer
Marie Samuels Board Member
Jessica Shaefer Board Member
Franklin Sirmans Board Member
Christopher E Vroom Founder/Officer
Summer Wheat Secretary
Jennifer Williams Board Member
Grant Withers Board Member
Margot Ziegler Board President
Brendan Fernandes Board Member
Ramon Manning Board Member
Janera Solomon Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAROLYN RAMOS Executive Dir. 9.6% of Rev
ANDISHEH AVINI Board Member
IAN ALTEVEER Board Member
BARBARA FOSCO Board Member
JOELLE CONNOLLY Board Member
LAURA ROBERSON FISCH Board President
MARJORY GRAUE Board Member
JOHN GUESS JR Board Member
CECILY HORTON Board Member
NAIMA KEITH Board Member
OLIVER FRANKEL Board Member
FRANKLIN SIRMANS Board Member
KAREN MEHIEL Treasurer
MARILYN MINTER Board Member
CHRISTOPHER E VROOM Board Member
RICHARD ZIEGELASCH Board Member
LAURIE ZIEGLER Board Member
MARGOT ZIEGLER Secretary
LISA WOLMAN Board Member
SUMMER WHEAT Board Member
MARIE SAMUELS Board Member
OLIVIA MARCIANO Board Member
NICK CAVE Board Member
SUSAN BRIDGES Board Member
JUDY NYQUIST Board Member
JENNIFER WILLIAMS Board Member
GRANT WITHERS Board Member
AURELE DANOFF PELARA Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
85 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
85 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,804 other orgs in US with NTEE prefix T2.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 0 points above the peer median (85 vs. 85).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.