Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
55
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 55 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 5.7% 63 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 40.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 33.9% 38 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 55 Fragile Recovery
2017 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 55 Fragile Recovery
2013 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ABIGAIL HANSON Board President 2.3% of Rev
BRETT MADDEN Board Member 1.4% of Rev
BROOK HOFSTETTER Board Member 1.2% of Rev
MASON BEAVER Board Member 0.8% of Rev
ANGELYN HARRIS Board Member 0.7% of Rev
STACY YOUGQUIST Board Member 0.5% of Rev
RIA PETH Board President
LEISHA SKINNER Secretary
DAN TOOMEY Treasurer
MYLES DOORN Board Member
CAROLE LEANDER Board Member
MARTHA PORTEOUS Board Member
TORI STEINER Board Member
KIM TURNER Board Member
SUSAN WATSON Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ABIGAIL HANSON Board President 1.4% of Rev
RIA PETH Board President 1.1% of Rev
CAROL LEANDER Board Member 0.5% of Rev
KIM TURNER Board Member 0.5% of Rev
BROOKE HOFSTETTER Board Member 0.5% of Rev
STACY YOUNGQUIST Board Member 0.4% of Rev
DANIEL TOOMEY Treasurer 0.3% of Rev
ANGELYN HARRIS Board Member 0.2% of Rev
SUSAN WATSON Board Member 0.1% of Rev
LEISHA SKINNER Secretary
HAROLD PAGE Board Member
MYLES DOORN Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RIA PETH Treasurer 0.8% of Rev
ABIGAIL HANSON Secretary 0.7% of Rev
KIM TURNER Board Member 0.7% of Rev
SOPHIA PRICE Board President 0.5% of Rev
LEISHA SKINNER Board Member 0.3% of Rev
HAROLD PAGE Board Member 0.1% of Rev
MATTHEW BIANCONI Board President
SUSAN WATSON Board Member
CAROL LEANDER Board Member
KEVIN COBLEY Board Member
ANGELYN HARRIS Board Member
COLBY PLAGGE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ABIGAIL HANSON Secretary 0.1% of Rev
MATTHEW BIANCONI Board President
RIA PETH Treasurer
HAROLD PAGE Board President
SUSAN WATSON Board Member
JANN BAREM Board Member
CAROL LEANDER Board Member
KEVIN COBLEY Board Member
AMANDA CURTIS Board Member
KIM TURNER Board Member
ANGELYN HARRIS Board Member
SOPHIA PRICE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMANDA CURTIS Board Member 1.6% of Rev
RIA VANDERPOOL Board President
DANIEL TOOMEY Treasurer
HAROLD PAGE Board President
MATTHEW BIANCONI Secretary
JANE SKINNER Board Member
SUSAN WATSON Board Member
JANN BAREM Board Member
CAROL LEANDER Board Member
KEVIN COBLEY Board Member
KIM TURNER Board Member
ANGELYN HARRIS Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 235 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 35 points above the peer median (75 vs. 40).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.