Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
26
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 25.8% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 24.7% 38 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 14.0% 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 18.0% 41 Fragile Recovery
2019 17.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 26.6% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2017 41 Fragile Recovery
2016 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 3.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 19.2% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 24.9% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 7.0% 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JONATHAN RUTTER Executive Director 20.7% of Rev
DAVE THUNE Board President
CHRIS ORTH Board President
DANIEL OTTO Treasurer
RONALD HLM RAMSAY Board Member
CORALIE WAI Board Member
BRENT BEHM Board Member
BEVERLY LAKE Board Member
VERN ROURKE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JONATHAN RUTTER Executive Director 19.1% of Rev
ANNA LEE Board President
CHRIS ORTH Board President
DANIEL OTTO Treasurer
EMILY WILLIAMS - WHEELER VOLUNTEER
RONALD HLM RAMSAY Board Member
J BRACKEN ROURKE Board Member
BRENT BEHM Board Member
BEV LAKE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
26 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 6 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 23 points below the peer median (15 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 32 → 26 over 5 years (declining by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.