Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
42
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2022 42 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 51 Fragile Recovery
2017 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 55 Fragile Recovery
2011 51 Fragile Recovery
2010 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Joan Enticknap Executive Director
Robert Smulling Secretary
Hang Yee Chin Treasurer
CInde Ennis Board President
Zane Schietinger Board Member
Joan Enticknap Executive Director
Robert Smulling Secretary
Hang Yee Chin Treasurer
CInde Ennis Board President
Zane Schietinger Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Joan Enticknap Executive Director
Robert Smulling Secretary
Hang Yee Chin Treasurer
CInde Ennis Board President
Zane Schietinger Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BETTY R CARTER Board President
CINDE ENNIS VICE PRESIDE
HANG YEE CHIN Treasurer
TRISH OBERST Board Member
ROBERT SMULLING Secretary
JEAN ENTICKNAP EXECUTIVE DI
VAL THOMAS-MATSON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
42 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 236 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points below the peer median (15 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 51 → 42 over 5 years (declining by 9 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.