Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
33
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 91.7% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 43 Fragile Recovery
2020 58.3% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 39 Fragile Recovery
2018 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 41 Fragile Recovery
2013 53.1% 16 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 54.9% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Erin Craver Treasurer 3.2% of Rev
Douglas Hildie Board President
Karen Johnson Secretary
Joan Rabinowitz Board President
Alan Garrels Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jesse Minkert Executive Director 29.8% of Rev
Douglas Hildie Board President
Karen Johnson Secretary
Joan Rabinowitz Treasurer
Alan Garrels Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jesse Minkert Executive Director 29.5% of Rev
Douglas Hildie Board President
Karen Johnson Secretary
Joan Rabinowitz Treasurer
Alan Garrels Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 236 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points below the peer median (5 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.