Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction
Overall
85
Score
Governance
85
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2023 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 9.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 2.0% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 6.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 7.4% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 11.5% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 9.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 14.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 13.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 9.9% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 13.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Wilson Platt Board President
Hilary Pickles Board President
Devorah Spadone Secretary
Myra Platt Board Member
Jane Jones Board Member
Gail Sehlhort Board Member
Jean White Board Member
Kevin Mckeon Board Member
Jen Teunon Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTINE STEPHERSON Board President
CLAY GUSTAVES VICE PRESIDE
BECKY MONK Secretary
SHERRY PERRAULT Treasurer
MARK BOYD Board Member
ROBERT VILLALOBOS Board Member
TINA FERGUSON Board Member
TINA GANGULY Board Member
MARY METASTASIO Board Member
CHRISTOPHER MUMAW Board Member
ANNE FISHER RAVENS Board Member
KATIE BOMBICO Board Member
NADIA CALDWELL Board Member
STUART FRANK Board Member
LORDIA WILLIAMS Board Member
MARGARET KINEKE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KAYTI BARNETT-OBRIEN Board Member 11.8% of Rev
MARY METASTASIO Board Member
CLAY GUSTAVES Board President
CHRISTOPHER MUMAW Board Member
LORDIA WILLIAMS Board Member
ANNE FISHER RAVENS Board Member
MARK BOYD Board Member
MARGARET KINEKE Board Member
STUART FRANK Board Member
TINA FERGUSON Board Member
TINA GANGULY Board Member
CHRISTINE STEPHERSON Board President
BECKY MONK Secretary
SHERRY PERRAULT Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JANE JONES Artistic Director 17.5% of Rev
KAYTI BARNETT-OBRIEN Board Member 14.9% of Rev
STUART FRANK Board President
MARGARET KINEKE Board President
LINDA BROWN Secretary
SHERRY PERRAULT Treasurer
JOHN ALDAYA Board Member
MARK BOYD Board Member
JOSE CLAIR Board Member
LAURA COLMAN Board Member
TINA FERGUSON Board Member
TINA GANGULY Board Member
CLAY GUSTAVES Board Member
MARY METASTASIO Board Member
BECKY MONK Board Member
CHRISTOPHER MUMAW Board Member
ANNE FISHER RAVENS Board Member
STEVEN SCHWARTZMAN Board Member
CHRISTINE STEPHERSON Board Member
LORDIA WILLIAMS Board Member
SHIRLEY ROBERSON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
85 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
85 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 2,343 other orgs in US with NTEE prefix Z9.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 0 points above the peer median (85 vs. 85).

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.