Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
46
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 33.4% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2023 61 Stable Stable Watch
2022 56.3% 54 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2021 64.2% 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 65.0% 54 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 65 Stable Stable Watch
2018 61 Stable Stable Watch
2017 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 61 Stable Stable Watch
2012 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 61 Stable Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sarah Hopkins Executive Director 20.4% of Rev
Jaclin Cummings Artistic Director 13.0% of Rev
Bruce Chesterman Board President
Lydia Newell Board President
Sandra Hansen Treasurer
Su Meredith Secretary
Sarah Hendron Board Member
Ruth Seignemartin Board Member
Riley Wing Board Member
Melissa Narrance Board Member
Gregory Burrill Board Member
Rebecca Chesterman Board Member
Nikki McNurlen Board Member
Cody Filby Board Member
Alina Murcar Board Member
Samson Lyman Board Member
Stephen Thurgood Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sarah Hopkins Executive Director 19.4% of Rev
Jaclin Cummings Artistic Director 12.1% of Rev
Gordon Ritchie Board President
Bruce Chesterman Board President
Lydia Newell Treasurer
Sandra Hansen Secretary
Heather Ritchie Board Member
Rebecca Chesterman Board Member
Su Meredith Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sarah Hopkins Executive Director 19.4% of Rev
Jaclin Cummings Artistic Director 12.1% of Rev
Gordon Ritchie Board President
Bruce Chesterman Board President
Lydia Newell Treasurer
Angela Amos Secretary
Heather Easterling Ritchie Board Member
Beth Torgerson Board Member
Rebecca Chesterman Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sarah Hopkins Executive Director 19.4% of Rev
Judy Hafso Artistic Director 11.4% of Rev
Gordon Ritchie Board President
Heather Easterling Ritchie Board Member
Bruce Chesterman Board President
Rebecca Chesterman Board Member
Lydia Newell Treasurer
Angela Little Secretary
Beth Torgerson Trustees
Verne Windham Board Member
Ruth Seignemartin Board Member
Miranda Chesterman Board Member
Ann Benson Board Member
Ellen Maccarone Board Member
Leah Ann Howard Board Member
Kris Hendron Board Member
Kristina Ploeger-Hekmatpanah Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 236 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 13 points above the peer median (45 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 33.4% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~23 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.