Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
29
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 11.5% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 0.1% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 — — 0.1% 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 — — 0.2% 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 — — 0.2% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — 0.3% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
IGOR SHAKHMNA Executive Director 11.2% of Rev
MICHAEL LIU MD Board Member 0.3% of Rev
CAROL VAN NATTA CHAIRMAN —
ANN BARDACKE Board Member —
DAVID BLOOM MD Board Member —
TAMMY BLOOM MD Board Member —
PAUL CHRISTENSEN Board Member —
RUSS GOCHNEAUR Board Member —
CHARLENE HISS Board Member —
KEN KIRN Board Member —
TIM KRAFT Board Member —
STEVEN MCCARTHY Board Member —
DAVID SMITH MD Board Member —
VICTORIA TULLETT Board Member —
CRAIG BREESE Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL LIU MD Board Member 0.1% of Rev
VICTORIA TULLETT CHAIRMAN —
ANN BARDACKE Board Member —
CAROL VAN NATTA Board Member —
DAVID BLOOM MD Board Member —
DAVID SMITH MD Board Member —
PAUL CHRISTENSEN Board Member —
STEVEN MCCARTHY Board Member —
TAMMY BLOOM MD Board Member —
TIM KRAFT Board Member —
CHARLENE HISS Board Member —
KEN KIRN Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL LIU MD Board Member 0.1% of Rev
VICTORIA TULLETT CHAIRMAN —
AMEY LAUD Board Member —
ANN BARDACKE Board Member —
BARBARA COMAN Board Member —
CAROL VAN NATTA Board Member —
DAVID BLOOM MD Board Member —
DAVID SMITH MD Board Member —
PAUL CHRISTENSEN Board Member —
STEVEN MCCARTHY Board Member —
TAMMY BLOOM MD Board Member —
TIM KRAFT Board Member —
WILL KITCHEN Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DR MICHAEL LIU MD Board Member 0.1% of Rev
KATHRYN L MCDONALD CHAIRMAN —
VICTORIA TULLETT VICE-CHAIRMAN —
PAUL CHRISTENSEN Board Member —
WILL KITCHEN Board Member —
AMEY LAUD Board Member —
DIMITRI ZGHENTI Board Member —
DAVID BLOOM Board Member —
TAMMY BLOOM Board Member —
JAKE GAMBLE Board Member —
CAROL VAN ATTA Board Member —
JUSTIN JENKS Board Member —
TAYLOR ANDERSON Board Member —
STEVEN MCCARTHY Board Member —
JAN KENNEDY Board Member —
TIM KRAFT Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 333 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 52 points below the peer median (0 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.