Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
51
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 4.7% 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 3.1% 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 3.2% 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 4.3% 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 3.8% 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 43.5% 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2017 — — — 50 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — — 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — — 50 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — 6.6% 50 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 7.1% 46 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — — 44 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JESSICA BORUSKY Executive Director 4.7% of Rev
CHERYL BERENSON Board Member —
MOLLIE PRICE Board Member —
KEITH COOKE Board Member —
JULIE HAMM Board Member —
EVE SANFORD-NICHOLSON Board Member —
FRANCISCO GUERRERO Board Member —
BECKY GELDER Board Member —
DIAN HARTONO Board President —
LEE CAMPBELL Board Member —
SARAH SHAIKH Treasurer —
CYNTHIA HIBBARD Board Member —
SUSAN MARABITO Board Member —
BERNICE TERRELL Board Member —
JO MIKESELL Board Member —
MATTHEW SCHAUB Board Member —
SAMANTHA SONG Secretary —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RYAN DAVIS Board Member 2.4% of Rev
MIKE YOON Board Member —
SUSAN EDELHEIT Board Member —
MOLLIE PRICE Secretary —
NAHEED GINA AAFTAAB Board Member —
TERRI HIROSHIMA Board President —
EVE SANFORD-NICHOLSON Board Member —
FRANCISCO GUERRERO Board President —
AYAKO SHAPIRO Board Member —
DIAN HARTONO Board President —
SARAH SHAIKH Treasurer —
MALLORY WEBSTER Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVE GALATRO Executive Director 4.7% of Rev
RICHARD WORTLEY Board Member —
SUSAN EDELHEIT Board Member —
CYNTHIA HIBBARD Board Member —
ANNA SKIBSKA Board Member —
TERRI HIROSHIMA Board President —
JENNIFER EINBERG Treasurer —
FLETCH WALLER Board President —
FRANCISCO GUERRERO Board Member —
AYAKO SHAPIRO Board Member —
DAMIEN VILLARREAL Secretary —
LORRIE CARDOSO Board President —
DIAN HARTONO Board Member —
JARED RADWYN Board Member —
SARAH SHAIKH Board Member —
MALLORY WEBSTER Board President —
RICHARD OPENSHAW Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVE GALATRO Executive Director 4.6% of Rev
LEE CAMPBELL Board Member —
RICHARD WORTLEY Board Member —
SUSAN EDELHEIT Board Member —
CYNTHIA HIBBARD Board Member —
ANNA SKIBSKA Board Member —
TERRI HIROSHIMA Board Member —
JENNIFER EINBERG Treasurer —
FLETCH WALLER Board President —
RALPH BUFANO Board Member —
FRANCISCO GUERRERO Board Member —
AYAKO SHAPIRO Board Member —
DAMIEN VILLAREAL Secretary —
LORRIE CARDOSO Board Member —
DIAN HARTONO Board Member —
JARED RADWYN Board Member —
SARAH SHAIKH Board Member —
MALLORY WEBSTER Board Member —
RICHARD OPENSHAW Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 13 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A4.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 37 points below the peer median (40 vs. 77).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.