Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
34
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 10.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 9.0% 40 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 13.5% 44 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 14.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 10.7% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 12.0% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — 10.3% 42 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 12.4% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 9.1% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 — — 11.5% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 — — — 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 40 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KELLY RAGSDALE Executive Director 10.2% of Rev
PJ PETERSON Board President —
LARRY FOX Board President —
JOANNA BRODERICK LEE Treasurer —
JEN MILLIREN Secretary —
VALORIE FUTCHER Board Member —
RICH COLEMAN Board Member —
JIM GRAY Board Member —
JIM JOHNSTON Board Member —
TERESA PURCELL Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KELLY RAGSDALE EXECUTIVE DI 9.6% of Rev
VIVIEN BASOM Board Member —
RICH COLEMAN Board Member —
TIFFANY DICKINSON Secretary —
LARRY FOX Board Member —
JIM JOHNSTON Board President —
JOANNA LEE Treasurer —
JEN MILLIREN Board Member —
PJ PETERSON Board President —
TERESA PURCELL Board Member —
MARGARET SMITH Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KELLY RAGSDALE EXECUTIVE DI 7.6% of Rev
GIAN MORELLI EXECUTIVE DI 4.8% of Rev
VIVIEN BASOM Board Member —
RICH COLEMAN Board Member —
TIFFANY DICKINSON Secretary —
LARRY FOX Board Member —
JIM JOHNSTON Board President —
SHAWN MARVIN Treasurer —
JEN MILLIREN Board Member —
PJ PETERSON Board President —
TERESA PURCELL Board Member —
MARGARET SMITH Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GIAN MORELLI EXECUTIVE DI 10.6% of Rev
VIVIEN BASOM Board Member —
KEN BOTERO Board Member —
TIFFANY DICKINSON Secretary —
JIM JOHNSTON Board Member —
SUE LANTZ Board President —
SHAWN MARVIN Treasurer —
JOHANN PETERS Board Member —
PATRICIA PETERSON Board Member —
BRUCE POLLOCK Board Member —
TERESA PURCELL Board Member —
CHRISTINA SCHOTT Board Member —
MARGARET SMITH Board Member —
SHARON ZIMMERMAN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 332 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 47 points below the peer median (5 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.