Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
22
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 25.2% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 25.1% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 20.4% 37 Fragile Recovery
2020 23.2% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 16.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 22.6% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 20.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2016 19.5% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2015 19.7% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 5.2% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 5.3% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 5.9% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 6.3% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kun Liu Board President
Andy Brockenbrough Secretary
Mike Haldeman Treasurer
Rebecca Leuthold Board Member
Yong Huang Board Member
Azlin McMann Board Member
CHARLES ATWOOD EKY EMPLOYEE
HSIN-CHI LIU KEY EMPLOYEE

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HSIN-CHI LIU KEY EMPLOYEE 15.1% of Rev
CHARLES ATWOOD EKY EMPLOYEE 14.3% of Rev
KUN LIU Board President
ANDY BROCKENBROUGH Secretary
MIKE HALDEMAN Treasurer
REBECCA LEUTHOLD Board Member
YONG HUANG Board Member
AZLIN MCMANN Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HSIN-CHI LIU KEY EMPLOYEE 12.4% of Rev
CHARLES ATWOOD KEY EMPLOYEE 11.5% of Rev
KUN LIU Board President
ANDY BROCKENBROUGH Secretary
MIKE HALDEMAN Treasurer
REBECCA K LEUTHOLD Board Member
YONG HUANG Board Member
AZLIN MCMANN Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
22 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 235 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 41 points below the peer median (0 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 31 → 22 over 5 years (declining by 9 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.