Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | — | — | — | 33 | Critical Intervention Needed | Recovery | |
| 2022 | — | — | 25.7% | 24 | Critical Intervention Needed | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 22 | Critical Intervention Needed | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 20 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 21 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 27 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 27 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 27 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 25 | Critical Intervention Needed | Recovery | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 23 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 27 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deborah Crosby | Academic Coach | 12.0% of Rev | ||
| Lois Byrd | Academic Coach | 7.3% of Rev | ||
| Bonita Smith | Athletic Coach | 6.7% of Rev | ||
| Sharon Boykins | Academic Coach | 5.2% of Rev | ||
| David Woods | Board Member | — | ||
| Lois Byrd | Secretary | — | ||
| Marvin Davis | Board Member | — | ||
| James Chambers | Board Member | — | ||
| DT Simmons | Board Member | — | ||
| David Woods - President | Board Member | — | ||
| Marvin Davis | Board Member | — | ||
| Elijah Smiley | Board Member | — | ||
| DT Simmons | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 245 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 16 points below the peer median (15 vs. 31).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 21 → 33 over 5 years (improving by 12 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
- Net assets declined for 3 consecutive years of deficit spending; cash runway narrowing.
- Financial resilience score in the bottom quartile — reserves and liabilities ratios warrant review.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
- Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.