Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
65
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
100
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 65 Stable Stable Watch
2022 68 Stable Stable Watch
2021 65 Stable Stable Watch
2020 59 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 65 Stable Stable Watch
2018 65 Stable Stable Watch
2017 61 Stable Stable Watch
2016 61 Stable Stable Watch
2015 61 Stable Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michael Gonzalez-Matsuda Board President
Rafael Kosche Secretary
Art Camacho Board Member
JD Bowles Vice President
Fariborz Azhakh Board Member
David Burgett Treasurer
Karen Gonzalez Clerical Manager

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michael Gonzalez-Matsuda Board President
Rafael Kosche Secretary
Art Camacho Board Member
JD Bowles Vice President
Fariborz Azhakh Board Member
David Burgett Treasurer
Karen Gonzalez Clerical Manager
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
100 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
65 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 7 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A8.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 56 points above the peer median (100 vs. 44).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.